TheRumpledOne
6,529 posts
msg #58466
- Ignore TheRumpledOne |
12/24/2007 9:46:51 AM
I leave that for you, Grunt.
|
welliott111
98 posts
msg #58474
- Ignore welliott111 |
12/24/2007 12:25:08 PM
"Sure, you can add the code to do that."
I KNEW IT!!!!! WE GOT 'EM NOW!!! YEEEEHAAAA!!!!!
|
luc1grunt
622 posts
msg #58476
- Ignore luc1grunt
modified |
12/24/2007 1:13:58 PM
Rump, I know M4M has his shit together. Just the scattered thoughts and abbreviations were screaming for a smartassed post like mine. I just got to this thread before Niko did!!
|
TheRumpledOne
6,529 posts
msg #58481
- Ignore TheRumpledOne |
12/24/2007 5:12:43 PM
welliott111
"Sure, you can add the code to do that."
I KNEW IT!!!!! WE GOT 'EM NOW!!! YEEEEHAAAA!!!!!
==================
HUH?
|
jimhbutton
104 posts
msg #58483
- Ignore jimhbutton |
12/24/2007 5:19:00 PM
luc1grunt,
Thanks luc.
I've read every post in this thread and that specific info was not covered. The function of each heading was covered (thankfully). However, the explanations of exactly what "MA" and "abs" represented was not.
|
TheRumpledOne
6,529 posts
msg #58486
- Ignore TheRumpledOne
modified |
12/24/2007 6:57:26 PM
Xgapped is OPEN MINUS CLOSE 1 DAY AGO.
absgap is the ABSOLUTE VALUE OF OPEN MINUS CLOSE 1 DAY AGO.
cma(absgap, 100) is the AVERAGE OF ABSGAP OVER THE LAST 100 DAYS.
May I suggest you read over the indicators.
|
jimhbutton
104 posts
msg #58494
- Ignore jimhbutton |
12/25/2007 1:45:07 AM
TRO,
Thanks for answering my question and for pointing me in the direction of the indicators. Hopefully, that section will cut down on the need to ask what could easily be construed as a stupid question.
I am personalizing many of your filters. Presently I am attempting to modify your gap up or down streak formula so that I can have a Close-to-High (i.e., Yesterday's Close to Today's High) streak indicator that measures potential profitability for when I hold overnight.
I'm glitching on it somewhere. Do you have a "Profit Streak" filter that fits that overnight definition (versus the typical Open-to-High measuring stick), or that can be adapted to fit that bill?
Hope your holidays are peaceful and prosperous.
jim
|
jimhbutton
104 posts
msg #58495
- Ignore jimhbutton |
12/25/2007 2:08:26 AM
I debugged the filter that I've been working on and got the following message:
"Filter Syntax checking aborted due to filter performance contraints. Due to performance issues, the Beta version of the StockFetcher Filter can not process your filter at this time. We hope to have this resolved in the future!"
That may explain the impasse that I reached.
|
jimhbutton
104 posts
msg #58497
- Ignore jimhbutton |
12/25/2007 2:24:04 AM
TRO,
After chucking a bunch of { } statements overboard -- as recommended by the debug post below that I received -- I was able to get my Close-to-High streak filter working.
"Filter Syntax checking aborted due to too many set statements. Due to performance issues, the Beta version of the StockFetcher Filter Syntax checker is unable to process filters with more than 10 set{} statements. We hope to have this resolved in the near future!"
jim
|
TheRumpledOne
6,529 posts
msg #58502
- Ignore TheRumpledOne
modified |
12/25/2007 9:58:15 AM
LOL!
The SF debugging only checks up to 10 SET STATEMENTS if I remember correctly.
You can add the statements back in now that your filter works.
Please post your filter.
|